Author Solutions Article by Keith Ogorek – Analysis


In life, certain things have a way of happening just at the right time. This week’s book publishing news was no exception. I have two quotes below from two senior principles from very diverse areas of the book publishing world, who in their own right believe they are making a difference. Here are the quotes. Follow the theme.

Quote One:
“We regard ourselves as independent in the sense of independence of third-party corporate ownership and feel at home with the other members.”

Quote Two:
“Now, through indie book publishing companies like AuthorHouse and iUniverse, authors can let the readers decide if their book is any good or not.”

The first quote is from Nigel Newton, CEO of Bloomsbury Publishing, talking about their newly acquired membership of the Independent Publishers Guild in England. Newton worked for a number of publishers during his career, and went on to start Bloomsbury Publishing in 1986. The company went on to great successes and was floated on the stock market in 1996. They have over 12,000 titles listed on Amazon, including J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series of books.

The second quote is by Keith Ogorek, Vice President of Marketing at Author Solutions, an author solution service company for self-publishing authors. They own AuthorHouse, iUniverse, Wordclay and Xlibris. They have 50,000 titles listed on Amazon and over the past twelve years have published 100,000 titles and 70,000 independent authors.

Earlier today, I posted a link to Keith Ogorek’s article released to the media entitled, ‘The Next Indie Revolution’. I would like to look at Keith’s article in a little more detail and discuss the observations and points he makes.

Readers of this site will already know that I have worked in music management and promotion during the 1990’s and I have touched upon my frustrations as to the way self-publishing seems to still have a stigma, while the self- production model which bands and artists have pursued in music has long been accepted. Keith Ogorek in his ‘Indie Revolution’ article makes some distinct similarities between what has already happened in the music industry and the changes happening now in the publishing world. I have no actual problem with Keith’s general comparisons in his article, but rather some of the conclusions and assertions he reaches.

Let me continue to quote from his article.

“That success led to other mainstream indie hits, including 1997’s ‘Chasing Amy’ and 1999’s ‘The Blair Witch Project’, and the independent film became as much a part of our entertainment culture as Warner Brothers or MGM.”

The assertion begins throughout this article of how author solution companies are following in the footsteps of the great independent film industry. What Keith does not point out is that the above films would never have been made without the considerable backing of private investors outside of the major studios which amounted to very considerable financial backing. He does not point out that his own ‘indie’ author solution companies offer services which are paid entirely by their authors, that is, author, singular, not authors. What he also does not point out is that any independent film would never have seen the light of day without guaranteed international distribution deals in place. Xlibris, iUniverse and AuthorHouse, effectively, if they were ‘indie’ film makers, would make the film available on a reel of film but have few deals in place that had someone sell and distribute that reel of film to every cinema house worldwide, big as well as small. It’s a late Saturday night movie without the beer and popcorn. It’s Warner Brothers without the ‘Warner’.

“The music industry has followed a similar path. Bands once dependent on major labels to produce their work now employ new technology to make their own music, and ultilize the Web and social media sites to promote and develop a following.”

New technology in publishing through Print-On-Demand has made publishing more affordable and accessible for the average author, but authors always had the option of self-publishing, albeit, previously having to use many unscrupulous vanity publishers. The technology has created more self-published authors because the reduced investment has introduced a larger pool of authors, who otherwise would have considered publishing a book as something entirely and financially out of their reach. The bands most successful with the ‘indie’ music approach, as Keith describes it, are from the traditional field of music; artists like Radiohead, Wilco and Barenaked Ladies. When James Patterson, J. K. Rowling and Jodi Picoult start getting into ‘indie’, I’ll give you a call Keith, and we can ‘network’.

Just for the record, Keith, as well, ‘indie’ in music actually refers to a music genre, rather than anything to do with some kind of ‘business model’. It came about during the 1980’s, about when Nigel Newton was ‘getting down’ and setting up Bloomsbury, and it refers to music labels like Rough Trade, Factory Records, 4AD; music labels held with a great deal of respect who were investing their own money in artists and bands to produce a genre of music entirely different than what was being produced by mainstream record companies.

“The Time for indie book publishing is now”

Really, Keith? Well, let’s get on the dance floor, eh? There is nothing ‘cool’, ‘indie’, ‘hip’ about selling book publishing dreams or presenting a ‘business model of independent publishing’ to a naive author as some kind of bona fide publishing plan for their book.

“For most, this system [traditional publishing] resulted in stacks of rejection letters and never reaching their goal of becoming a published author.”

The ‘goal’ of most serious authors is to hone their craft and become successful, respected, well read, and not just to ‘publish’. Nowadays, anyone for nothing (Lulu) or a small fee can be ‘published’. The real work for an author only just begins when a book sees the light of day.

“…less than one in twenty manuscripts actually gets published, which is why this system [traditional publishing] is so frustrating for writers seeking to become authors.”

One in twenty? Try one in a thousand and you will be closer to the truth.

“And what about discovering new talent? How does that happen?”

Eh…same way it always did, Keith. By perseverance, hard work; not by ease of publication. That can never be the answer, and least of all by any author solution service that cannot provide physical shelf space as well as on line availability.

“Let the reader decide”

Sure, but they have to know a book exists first. Getting it on to a wholesaler or retailers database is fine for the booksellers, but they are not the readers. So we are back to the core of what separates many author solution companies from traditional publishers. Traditional publishers have distributors, that is, dedicated companies with trained and skilled sales representatives who know how to sell books direct to retailers.

“Over the last decade, as new technologies have emerged, the obstacles that once loomed in front of perspective authors have all but vanished.”

How have they vanished, Keith? Print-On-Demand is a print technology; it does not put books on store shelves or scream at the top of its voice or give reviews or critiques of books. Having an on line presence for a book may open the viable network, but ultimately someone has still got to do something.

“Supported self-publishing is not the same as vanity publishing”

Please, not another label Keith for self-publishing. We already have POD Publishing, Self-Publishing, Vanity Publishing, Subsidy Publishing, and Partnership Publishing, now, it is Supported Self-Publishing; I’m worn out with all these tag lines! Hang on; I thought we were doing ‘indie’ publishing…

“Authors have two options when choosing indie book publishing.”

Keith goes on to explain that these are a vanity publisher or an author solution service like AuthorHouse or iUniverse.

In my experience, no author goes out to choose a vanity publisher. Actually, there are three. The author can approach a mid-range publisher like Bloomsbury, a smaller independent publisher (pursuing a traditional contract), or they can self-publish. And in self-publishing, they can undertake everything themselves, or choose to go with an author solutions company (which they need to ensure is not a vanity publisher); be it AuthorHouse, Lulu, Mill City, Infinity, or whoever.

“True, an author has to make an investment in getting his or her book to the market, but for many, the cost is around a thousand dollars. However, with that investment, authors are assured their book will be in the market, and if the book is any good, they will start to recoup their losses pretty quickly.”

The reality is for many author solution companies; all the author is getting is a book set-up with a printer and on line availability. OK Keith, let’s see how much marketing you get with a thousand dollars with AuthorHouse, iUniverse and Xlibris for your next book. Looking at the author royalties from these companies, even at $2 per book, the author would have to sell 500 copies to break even. The vast majority of self-publishing titles through these publishers rarely make above a hundred copies sold.

“The reality is today, even if your name is Clancy or Rowling, you will do your own marketing.”

Yes, the authors will be part of the marketing strategy and presence, but they are not the marketing for their books alone. There are considerable budgets made available for authors like Mr Clancy and Ms Rowling. Not traditional publisher is going to take on an author’s book, whether they are new or previously published, spend several thousand on editing, proofing, design, layout without investing a similar amount of money in marketing that book.

“Readers and book buyers get a vote now equal to the acquisitions editors of major publishing houses.”

Yes, but most readers would like to know that the book they have purchased has passed before the editor eyes as well as his big red pen.

To be fair, there is a lot that Keith Ogorek has got right in this article about the changes in publishing. Author Solutions need to address those changes. Instead of thinking about their next author solution acquisition, they need to focus on what separates them from the traditional model of publishing and not what makes them the same as the traditional model. If Author Solutions want to show that they understand the changes in the publishing industry, then they should try acquiring some bookstore real estate, or perhaps buying some Espresso Book Machines and leasing them out to bookstores. Now there is an idea, Keith.

Here is the original Author Soulutions link to the article by Keith Ogorek.



  1. Nancy Beck said:

    I think you’re right on about this. (I came over from Absolute Write.) By making comparisons between music and the printed word is like the old thing of comparing apples and oranges.

    Besides, with Lulu’s free and reasonably low services, why should I ever have to use Authorhouse or any of the other companies under that banner?

    Thanks for posting this.

  2. Mick Rooney said:

    Just to add some balance, I wanted to post some pertinent comments by Henry Baum, Editor of where this article also appeared.

    Mick, I think this is unnecessarily cynical about the prospects for self-publishing. Obviously, he has a profit motive to talk up the potential for subsidy publishing, but at core he’s right. The comparison isn’t self-publishing vs. putting out a record through a label like 4AD – the comparison is bands that have gotten successful without an indie label, via Myspace, online promotion, and playing shows. It’s much easier to put out a record through a label like Sub Pop or Matador, just as it’s easier to put out a book through Soft Skull or Akashic, but those aren’t the only avenues.

    Trouble is writers can’t sell out a rock club the way an unsigned band can. And as I wrote earlier here, it takes all of two minutes to listen to a song, as opposed to investing real time in reading a book. So all told, it’s much harder to become a grass roots success as a writer than it is as a band. But the potential is now there for self-publishing to at least lose the stigma that it’s had and be considered a legitimate form of independent publishing, rather than pathetic fall-back plan, or populated by only sub-par writing. So really, it’s an exciting time to be part of this “movement,” so I don’t think he’s totally off base, even if what he’s writing amounts to a long commercial for his services.

    Henry Baum, Editor,